Following Thursday`s Federal Council meeting, Gabriele Gravina, president of the Italian Football Federation (FIGC), addressed a wide range of topics concerning the national team. Among these was the potential postponement of Serie A`s 30th matchday to benefit the Azzurri ahead of possible World Cup playoffs. Gravina stated that a dialogue is already underway, but acknowledged that two crucial qualification matches still need to be played, and football is governed by “ruthless laws.” He indicated that a decision on any potential changes would be made after the November 21st draw.
Gravina considers the idea of postponing a league match “rather fanciful” given the packed fixture schedule. Instead, he appeals to the “common sense” of the Serie A League to consider organizing a couple of training camps, specifically one around February 9-10. This initiative aims to bridge the long gap between November 16th and March 26th, allowing the national coach to work with the players collectively. He noted there`s openness to discuss this, considering the clubs` national and international commitments.
Challenges and Performance of the Azzurri
When pressed on matters concerning the Italian national team`s performance, Gravina delved into specifics regarding the Azzurri`s recent trajectory. He highlighted how results significantly influence outcomes and the critical importance of having a broad pool of selectable players. Gravina recalled a moment of great difficulty during the final phase of the European qualifiers, specifically the match against Switzerland, which he pinpointed as a low point. However, he also celebrated periods of great exhilaration, such as winning in France after many years and one of the “most beautiful matches of the Spalletti era” against Belgium.
While acknowledging recent critical moments, Gravina stressed the need not to overlook past achievements. He pointed out that both the senior national team and the U21s achieved four extraordinary results in their last four games without negative calendar impact, unlike opponents who had ample preparation time. He cited clear calendar disadvantages, with Italy playing two matches while rivals played one, and their direct competitor having extra preparation time due to more favorable scheduling.
Gravina expressed frustration that Italy risks not qualifying despite a strong overall performance, mentioning they could win seven out of eight matches and still miss out, while some teams qualify for playoffs with just one point – a situation he labeled unhelpful. He concluded by noting that in the current tournament, Italy won five out of six matches, implying it only appears disastrous because of one lost game.
Controversy Surrounding the Israel Match
Gravina also addressed the ongoing debate in Italy about whether the match against Israel should have been played. He clarified that the disturbances were not announced and were caused by individuals unrelated to pro-Palestinian supporters, appearing instead as an organized “gang” intent on destruction and vandalism in Udine. Gravina strongly criticized those who suggested not playing the game, calling it a “great idiocy.”
He questioned whether Italy should have forfeited the match, incurred penalties, and effectively sent Israel to the World Cup. Emphasizing football`s role in bringing people together, he described the stadium atmosphere as festive, joyful, and serene. He noted peaceful relations with the Israeli management after the game. Gravina suggested it might have been fate that the match occurred just days after a seemingly unstoppable conflict was suspended. He unequivocally condemned the acts of “guerrilla” and vandalism in Udine, stating that such scenes are unacceptable and should not be confused with calls to cancel a football match.
